Askew-0.mp3
Askew-0.mp4
Askew-I.mp3
Askew-I.mp4
Askew-II.mp3
Askew-II.mp4
Askew-III.mp3
Askew-III.mp4
Askew-intro.mp3
[Intro]
Like a speedometer (Our barometer)
With a broken needle (Going fetal)
Barreling toward a cliff (Societal riff)
Can we pull through?
[Bridge]
All’s askew
(What cha gonna do?)
[Verse 1]
Underestimate
Acceleration rate
Ignore some more
Will we endure
[Chorus]
Like a speedometer (Our barometer)
With a broken needle (Going fetal)
Barreling toward a cliff (Societal riff)
Can we pull through?
[Bridge]
All’s askew
(What cha gonna do?)
[Verse 2]
Conceal damage
Of our age
Flukes born
Now the norm
[Chorus]
Like a speedometer (Our barometer)
With a broken needle (Going fetal)
Barreling toward a cliff (Societal riff)
Can we pull through?
[Bridge]
All’s askew
(What cha gonna do?)
[Chorus]
Like a speedometer (Our barometer)
With a broken needle (Going fetal)
Barreling toward a cliff (Societal riff)
Can we pull through?
[Outro]
All’s askew
(What cha gonna do?)
A SCIENCE NOTE
What’s askew in the statistics of the climate crisis? Quite a bit — and in deep, structural ways. Here’s a breakdown of how the data is distorted, lagging, or misused, which makes it hard to grasp the true scope of the emergency:
1. Underreporting and Lag Effects
-
Climate damage is cumulative and delayed. Today’s emissions won’t show full impact for decades.
-
Official stats often exclude long-term costs (e.g. ocean acidification, permafrost methane release).
-
Metrics like GDP count disaster rebuilding as economic growth, masking real damage.
2. Fat Tails Ignored
-
Climate risk has “fat tails” — meaning extreme events are more likely than normal models assume.
-
But governments often use linear projections or normal distributions, downplaying worst-case scenarios.
-
This creates a false sense of security.
3. Local Extremes Hidden by Averages
-
Global temperature averages blur local devastation.
-
Example: A 1.5°C rise globally might mean 5°C+ in the Arctic.
-
-
Rainfall data is averaged, masking flash floods, drought clusters, or weather whiplash.
4. Standard Deviations Are Now Norms
-
What used to be 3-sigma (once-in-a-century) weather is now common — but the framing hasn’t caught up.
-
Insurance models, infrastructure codes, and risk planning are still based on outdated “normal” weather data.
5. Externalities and Hidden Costs
-
Fossil fuels appear “cheap” only because their climate costs are off the books.
-
U.S. subsidies and military spending to secure fossil energy aren’t counted as climate costs — a statistical blind spot.
Summary
The climate crisis is statistically askew because the tools we use:
Underestimate nonlinear risk.
Ignore delayed effects.
Conceal damage behind averages.
Treat outliers as flukes, when they’re becoming the norm.
It’s like using a speedometer with a broken needle while barreling toward a cliff.