- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-I.mp3
- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-I.mp4
- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-II.mp3
- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-II.mp4
- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-III.mp3
- Spend__Bring-on-the-End-III.mp4
[Intro]
All in favor, say “Aye.”
No, not I
[Verse 1]
The right is wrong
The left has left
All in favor, say “Aye.”
No, not I
[Chorus]
All in favor, say “Aye.”
No, not I
No time to cry
We’re all gonna die
[Bridge]
Why not try
To get by?
[Instrumental, Guitar Solo, Drum Fills]
[Verse 2]
The right ain’t bright
What’s left lost sight
All in favor, say “Aye.”
No, not I
[Chorus]
All in favor, say “Aye.”
No, not I
No time to cry
We’re all gonna die
[Bridge]
Why not try
To get by?
[Instrumental, Saxophone Solo, Bass]
[Bridge]
Spend, spend, spend
Bring on The End
Borrow, if they’ll lend
Spend
Bring on The End
[Instrumental, Guitar Solo, Drum Fills]
[Outro]
Spend, spend, spend
Bring on The End
Borrow, if they’ll lend
Spend
Bring on The End
A SCIENCE NOTE
Both political parties have concurred to allocate unlimited emergency funding for climate disasters instead of proactively preventing them. This approach highlights a reactive stance towards climate change rather than a proactive one. The decision to focus on emergency funding underscores a tendency to address the immediate aftermath of climate-related disasters, such as hurricanes, wildfires, and floods, which often result in substantial loss of life, property damage, and economic disruption.
Emergency funding is crucial for disaster relief and recovery efforts, ensuring that affected communities receive the necessary support to rebuild and recover. However, this strategy can be seen as shortsighted because it does not address the root causes of climate change or invest in measures to mitigate its impacts. Proactive measures, such as investing in renewable energy, enhancing infrastructure resilience, implementing stricter environmental regulations, and promoting sustainable practices, can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of climate disasters.
The reliance on emergency funding also strains public resources and can lead to higher long-term costs. By not investing in preventative measures, the government may face escalating expenses as climate change continues to intensify and increase the occurrence of extreme weather events.
In summary, while both political parties recognize the need for immediate relief in the face of climate disasters, there is a critical need for a more balanced approach that includes significant investments in preventative measures. This dual strategy would help mitigate the impacts of climate change and reduce the need for emergency funding over time, leading to a more sustainable and resilient future.